Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 53
Filter
1.
J Immigr Minor Health ; 25(3): 507-521, 2023 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2283620

ABSTRACT

Previous evidence showed significant discrepancies in psychiatric services utilization between migrants and reference populations. Our study aims were to evaluate incidence and characteristics of psychiatric hospitalizations of migrant patients compared with reference populations and to assess how the COVID-19 pandemic affected admissions. All patients admitted to the psychiatric ward "SPDC-Malpighi" of the Bologna Mental Health Department from 01/01/2018 to 31/12/2020 were included. Differences in sociodemographic and clinical characteristics were tested by migrant status. Incidence rate ratios of hospital admissions by migrant status were estimated via Poisson regression considering population-at-risk, gender, and age-group. Migrants had higher hospitalization rates due to any psychiatric disorder (IRR = 1.16). The risk was especially pronounced among women (IRR = 1.25) and within the youngest age-group (IRR = 3.24). Young migrants had also a greater risk of compulsory admission (IRR = 3.77). Regarding admissions due to a specific diagnosis, we found relevant differences in hospitalization rates for psychosis, mood disorders, and personality disorders. Finally, migrants were more likely to be admitted via Emergency Department and less likely to be referred from a specialist. During the year of pandemic (2020) we observed an increase in the proportion of migrants admitted voluntarily or compulsorily. Migrants, especially those from the youngest age-group, had higher hospitalization rates for any disorder. Younger migrants were also at higher risk of compulsory treatment. The distribution of psychiatric admissions during the pandemic period seemed to have further increased discrepancies in mental healthcare needs and provision between migrants and the reference population. Tailored interventions and policies are urgently needed to address this issue.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Transients and Migrants , Female , Humans , COVID-19/epidemiology , Hospitalization , Italy/epidemiology , Pandemics , Psychiatric Department, Hospital , Retrospective Studies , Male
2.
Psychiatry Res ; 322: 115042, 2023 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2244156

ABSTRACT

During the first Covid-19 outbreak, the Niguarda Hospital of Milan featured two Psychiatry wards, one for SARS-CoV-2 positive patient and one for patients requiring hospitalization and negative for SARS-CoV-2. The two groups of patients were compared and were similar in distribution of psychiatric diagnosis, duration of illness and previous hospitalizations. SARS-CoV-2 positive participants had a lower severity of symptoms both at admission and discharge, a lower frequency of psychotic symptoms and substance intoxication at admission. These findings suggest that patients admitted to the COVID ward were hospitalized not only for their mental health condition but also because of the infection.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Humans , SARS-CoV-2 , Psychiatric Department, Hospital , Case-Control Studies , Hospitalization , Hospitals, Urban , Demography
3.
BMC Health Serv Res ; 22(1): 1048, 2022 Aug 17.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1993358

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The current pandemic situation led to deep changes not only in social relationships, but also on clinical care and access to healthcare facilities. The authors aimed to understand whether this context affected the main characteristics of psychiatric hospitalizations, measured by admissions in a portuguese acute psychiatric ward. METHODS: Retrospective data collection of all patients admitted in Centro Hospitalar Psiquiátrico de Lisboa, in two different time periods: pre-COVID-19 (march 11th, 2019 to march 10th, 2020, n = 1845) and COVID-19 (march 11th, 2020 to march 10th, 2021, n = 1278); comparing the number of total admissions, compulsory ones, age, sex, median days of admission, median days to readmission and diagnosis at discharge. Distribution of disorders in both groups, as well as in compulsory admissions were also evaluated. The same comparisons were evaluated in the 15-25-year-old patient group. RESULTS: Statistical significance was found regarding total number of admissions (reduction of around 30.7%), as well as compulsory ones (reduction of 14%, although the relative frequency had increased), days of admission and distribution between admissions (with lower reductions regarding dementias, schizophrenia and affective disorders, while substance use disorders and intellectual disabilities presented reductions of over 50%), with no differences between gender, median age, previous admissions or readmissions. Distribution between compulsory admissions did not present differences before and during COVID periods. For patients between 15 and 25 years of age, statistical significance was found regarding total number of compulsory ones (94 versus 44, p-value = 0.01), and in all groups of diagnoses (all with p-value = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: While there was a general reduction in the overall number of patients admitted, in the most severe conditions (compulsory admissions and schizophrenia diagnosis) did not present such a reduction. Difficulties in social, clinical and family networks can explain the reduction of the time to readmission. Future research could show whether there is a rebound increase number of admissions in the other diagnoses. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The current study was approved by the hospital's scientific and ethics committees (CCP number 0060/2021 and CES 09/2021).


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Mental Disorders , Substance-Related Disorders , Adolescent , Adult , COVID-19/epidemiology , Hospitalization , Humans , Inpatients , Mental Disorders/epidemiology , Mental Disorders/therapy , Pandemics , Psychiatric Department, Hospital , Retrospective Studies , Young Adult
4.
Rev Soc Bras Med Trop ; 55: e0177, 2022.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1987218

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: An outbreak of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) Omicron variant was detected in the psychiatric ward of a general hospital in Brasília, Brazil. METHODS: We report the investigation, clinical outcomes, viral sequencing, and control measures applied to outbreak containment. RESULTS: The overall attack rate was 95% (23/24) in a period of 13 days. Among the cases, 78% (18/23) were vaccinated and 17% (4/23) required intensive care. The Omicron variant was isolated from the 19 sequenced samples. CONCLUSIONS: The findings highlight the potential harm that highly transmissible variants may generate among hospitalized populations, particularly those with comorbidities.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , SARS-CoV-2 , Brazil/epidemiology , Disease Outbreaks , Hospitals, General , Humans , Psychiatric Department, Hospital , SARS-CoV-2/genetics
5.
Int J Environ Res Public Health ; 19(16)2022 08 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1979267

ABSTRACT

During the COVID-19 pandemic there have been numerous reports of increases in psychiatric morbidity and a deterioration of status among existing patients. There is little information about how this increase has affected youth and rates of adolescent psychiatric hospitalization. Our study was aimed at examining trends in youth psychiatric hospitalization during the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic. Method: We used medical records to compare trends in hospitalization rates from 2019 to 2020, among psychiatric youth wards from five different centers in Israel. Results: The number of patients that were hospitalized in youth psychiatric wards decreased significantly from 2019 (Mean ± SD=52.2 ± 28.6 per month) to 2020 (M&nbsp;± SD = 40.8 ± 22.0; unstandardized B = -11.4, 95% CI = -14.4 to -8.3, p < 0.0001). There was a significant decrease in the number of patients that were hospitalized due to internalizing disorders from 2019 (M&nbsp;± SD = 22.3 ± 9.3 per month) to 2020 (M&nbsp;± SD = 16.8 ± 7.7; B = -5.5, 95% CI = -8.0 to -3.0, p = 0.0002) and a marginally significant increase in the number of restraints per month (2019: M&nbsp;± SD = 2.8 ± 6.8, 2020: M&nbsp;± SD = 9.0 ± 14.5; Z = -1.96, Rosenthal's r = 0.36, p = 0.07). Conclusions: There was a significant decline in psychiatric hospitalizations during the pandemic, specifically among patients suffering from internalizing disorders. The reasons for this decline, and the future impact these changes had on hospitalizations during the pandemic demand further research. Study limitations: This is a retrospective multicenter study from five medical centers in Israel, therefore generalizability of our findings is limited.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Adolescent , COVID-19/epidemiology , Hospitalization , Humans , Israel/epidemiology , Pandemics , Psychiatric Department, Hospital
6.
Psychiatr Pol ; 56(1): 115-122, 2022 Feb 27.
Article in English, Polish | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1897191

ABSTRACT

The novel coronavirus disease (COVID-19) epidemic - in addition to its many widely described negative consequences - has created achallenge for the mental health care system in every country, including Poland to safely manage psychiatric disorders in addition to preventing and treating COVID-19. In Poland, online mental health services are provided for the outpatients. Still there are patients with severe psychiatric disorders who have suspected or confirmed COVID-19 and need to be treated in a psychiatric hospital. The Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry of the Medical University of Warsaw was appointed by local authorities to hospitalize childrenwith mental disorders and with confirmed or suspected COVID-19. This created an urgent need to adapt our department for treating COVID-19 infected patients. As far as we know no guidelines for psychiatric hospitals management during the COVID-19 pandemic are available in English. In this manuscript, we present our guidelines regarding safe management of patients with suspected or confirmed COVID-19 in the Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry of the Medical University of Warsaw.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Mental Disorders , Adolescent , COVID-19/therapy , Child , Humans , Mental Disorders/diagnosis , Mental Disorders/epidemiology , Mental Disorders/therapy , Pandemics/prevention & control , Psychiatric Department, Hospital , SARS-CoV-2
7.
PLoS One ; 17(5): e0269044, 2022.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1865348

ABSTRACT

It has been reported that the COVID-19 pandemic has predisposed adolescents to risky behaviors such as substance use and subsequent substance use disorder (SUD). However, it is unknown how the pandemic has changed the prevalence of SUD among adolescents in Uganda. We aimed to determine the prevalence of SUD and associated factors among adolescents in southwestern Uganda. Retrospectively, psychiatry ward records from November 2018 to July 2021 were collected from the largest tertiary hospital in southwestern Uganda. A total of 441 adolescent records were included in the analysis, with a mean age was 17±1.88 years, and the majority were males (50.34%). The overall prevalence of SUD was 7.26% (5.90% and 9.80% before and during the pandemic). Despite a little rise in SUD (3.9% increment) during the COVID-19 pandemic, there was no statistical difference compared to before the pandemic. The likelihood of being diagnosed with SUD was more among older adolescents at any period. In addition, having a diagnosis of bipolar mood disorder reduced the likelihood of SUD during the pandemic. This study indicated no statistical change in the diagnosis of SUD among adolescents before and during the COVID-19 pandemic. As older-male adolescents (17 to 19 years) were at higher risk of SUD, there is a need for early intervention for this group.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Substance-Related Disorders , Adolescent , COVID-19/epidemiology , Comorbidity , Female , Humans , Male , Pandemics , Psychiatric Department, Hospital , Registries , Retrospective Studies , Substance-Related Disorders/psychology , Uganda/epidemiology
8.
HERD ; 15(4): 354-368, 2022 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1846757

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: The COVID-19 pandemic has impacted healthcare systems worldwide. Although this disease has primarily impacted general medicine intensive care units, other areas of healthcare including psychiatry were modified in response to corona measures to decrease the transmission of the disease. Reflecting on the modifications to the environment provides an opportunity to design psychiatric environments for future pandemics or other demands for healthcare. BACKGROUND: The therapeutic environment of psychiatric wards was modified in Friesland, the Netherlands, in response to COVID-19. During this time, an interdisciplinary team met consistently to contribute to the preliminary design of a new psychiatric hospital. METHODS: During the first 18 months of the pandemic, clinical reflections were made to describe the impact of COVID-19 on the psychiatric care environment. Architects have created a preliminary design of a new psychiatric hospital based on these reflections, monthly collaborative design discussions based on virtual mock-ups and evidence-based design based on theoretical concepts and research. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: This theoretical and reflective study describes how an inpatient psychiatric environment was restructured to manage infection during COVID-19. The therapeutic environment of the psychiatric ward and patient care changed drastically during COVID-19. The number of patients accessing care decreased, patient autonomy was restricted, and the function of designated behavioral support spaces changed to manage the risk of infection. However, these challenging times have provided an opportunity to reflect on theories and consider the design of new hospital environments that can be adapted in response to future pandemics or be restructured for different care functions.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , COVID-19/epidemiology , Hospitals, Psychiatric , Humans , Pandemics , Psychiatric Department, Hospital , SARS-CoV-2
9.
J Korean Med Sci ; 37(4): e28, 2022 Jan 24.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1650103

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: A rapid decline in immunity and low neutralizing activity against the delta variant in severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) vaccinees has been observed. This study describes an outbreak of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) breakthrough infections caused by the SARS-CoV-2 delta variant in a psychiatric closed ward. METHODS: Data from epidemic intelligence service officers were utilized to obtain information regarding demographic, vaccination history, and clinical data along with SARS-CoV-2 PCR test results for a COVID-19 outbreak that occurred in a closed psychiatric ward. RESULTS: Among the 164 residents, 144 (87.8%) received two doses of vaccines and 137 (95.1%) of them received ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 vaccine. The mean interval between the second vaccination and COVID-19 diagnosis was 132.77 ± 40.68 days. At the time of detection of the index case, SARS-CoV-2 had spread throughout the ward, infecting 162 of 164 residents. The case-fatality ratio was lower than that in the previously reported outbreak before the vaccination (1.2%, 2/162 vs. 6.9%, P = 0.030). Prolonged hospitalization occurred in 17 patients (11.1%) and was less prevalent in the vaccinated group than in the unvaccinated group (8.5% vs. 25.0%, P = 0.040). CONCLUSION: The findings of this study highlight that while vaccination can reduce mortality and the duration of hospitalization, it is not sufficient to prevent an outbreak of the SARS-CoV-2 delta variant in the present psychiatric hospital setting.


Subject(s)
COVID-19/epidemiology , COVID-19/mortality , Disease Outbreaks/statistics & numerical data , Psychiatric Department, Hospital/statistics & numerical data , SARS-CoV-2/immunology , COVID-19 Testing , COVID-19 Vaccines , ChAdOx1 nCoV-19/immunology , Health Personnel/statistics & numerical data , Hospitalization/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Vaccination/statistics & numerical data
11.
J Nerv Ment Dis ; 209(12): 884-891, 2021 12 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1566104

ABSTRACT

ABSTRACT: Recent studies indicated that psychiatric inpatients with severe mental illness (SMI) are at a greater risk of morbidity and mortality from COVID-19. However, there is still little data about the impact of comorbid COVID-19 infection on the course and outcome of acute exacerbations in this population. We conducted a prospective historically matched case control study. The sociodemographic and clinical characteristics of acute psychiatric inpatients with SMI and comorbid COVID-19 (n = 21) were compared with those of historically-matched non-COVID-19 controls with SMI (n = 42). The outcomes for acute inpatients with SMI and COVID-19 were also investigated. The new-onset SMI rate was relatively higher (23.8%) in the COVID-19 group, which has characteristics similar to those of the non-COVID-19 group except for working status (p < 0.05). The COVID-19 group had a high rate of relapse (47.6%) within 6 months of discharge. Our study suggests that patients with SMI who contracted SARS-CoV-2 may have a higher rate of new-onset mental disorder. Considering the high rate of relapse during the pandemic, chronically ill patients with SMI and COVID-19 should be closely monitored after discharge.


Subject(s)
COVID-19/epidemiology , Mental Disorders/epidemiology , Acute Disease , Adult , Aged , Case-Control Studies , Chronic Disease , Comorbidity , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Prospective Studies , Psychiatric Department, Hospital/statistics & numerical data , Recurrence , Symptom Flare Up , Turkey/epidemiology
12.
J Nerv Ment Dis ; 209(12): 892-898, 2021 12 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1541604

ABSTRACT

ABSTRACT: In response to COVID-19 mitigation policies, mental health and social service agencies have had to rapidly change their operations, creating challenges for patients with serious mental illness (SMI). This study aimed to explore the experiences of adults with SMI navigating these altered systems during the pandemic. In-depth interviews were conducted with 20 hospitalized adults with SMI in the fall of 2020; they were coded using thematic analysis. Most participants found the new systems effective at meeting their essential needs. However, several reported significant unmet needs, including inability to access mental health care and public benefits. These participants lacked identification documents, housing, and/or a personal device. Although none of the participants used telemedicine before COVID-19, most reported no or minimal problems with telemental health. Those reporting difficulties did not have personal devices, were receiving audio-only services, or viewed telemedicine as less personal or too distracting.


Subject(s)
COVID-19/prevention & control , Health Services Accessibility , Mental Disorders/therapy , Mental Health Services , Patient Acceptance of Health Care , Telemedicine , Adult , Aged , District of Columbia , Female , Ill-Housed Persons , Hospitalization , Humans , Male , Medicaid , Middle Aged , Psychiatric Department, Hospital , Qualitative Research , United States , Young Adult
13.
Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry ; 110: 110304, 2021 08 30.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1410756

ABSTRACT

AIMS: The present investigation aimed at evaluating differences in psychiatric hospitalizations in Italy during and after the lockdown due to the novel coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), compared to the same periods in 2018 and 2019. METHODS: We obtained and analyzed anonymized data on psychiatric admissions (n = 4550) from 12 general hospital psychiatric wards (GHPWs) in different Italian regions (catchment area = 3.71 millions of inhabitants). Using a mixed-effects Poisson regression model, we compared admission characteristics across three periods: (a) March 1-June 30, 2018 and 2019; (b) March 1-April 30, 2020 (i.e., lockdown); and (c) May 1-June 30, 2020 (i.e., post-lockdown). RESULTS: During the COVID-19 lockdown, there was a 41% reduction (IRR = 0.59; p < 0.001, CI: 0.45-0.79) in psychiatric admissions in the enrolled GHPWs with respect to the 2018 and 2019 control period. Conversely, admission rates in the post-lockdown period were similar to those observed in the control period. Notably, a consistent and significant reduction in psychiatric hospitalizations of older patients (aged >65 years) was observed in the lockdown (40%; IRR = 0.60; 95% CI: 0.44-0.82) and post-lockdown (28%; IRR = 0.72; 95% CI: 0.54-0.96) periods. Long-stay admissions (>14 days) increased (63%; IRR = 1.63; 95% CI: 1.32-2.02) during the lockdown and decreased by 39% thereafter (IRR = 0.61; 95% CI: 0.49-0.75). A significant 35% increase in patients reporting suicidal ideation was observed in the post-lockdown period, compared to the rate observed in the 2018 and 2019 control period (IRR = 1.35; 95% CI: 1.01-1.79). CONCLUSION: The COVID-19 lockdown was associated with changes in the number of psychiatric admissions, particularly for older patients and long-stay hospitalizations. Increased admission of patients reporting suicidal ideation in the post-lockdown period merits special attention. Further studies are required to gain insight into the observed phenomena.


Subject(s)
COVID-19/psychology , Hospitalization/statistics & numerical data , Psychiatric Department, Hospital/statistics & numerical data , Suicidal Ideation , Adult , Age Factors , Aged , COVID-19/complications , COVID-19/epidemiology , Communicable Disease Control , Female , Humans , Italy/epidemiology , Length of Stay/statistics & numerical data , Male , Middle Aged , Young Adult
14.
Psychosomatics ; 61(6): 662-671, 2020.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1386490

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Patients with psychiatric illnesses are particularly vulnerable to highly contagious, droplet-spread organisms such as SARS-CoV-2. Patients with mental illnesses may not be able to consistently follow up behavioral prescriptions to avoid contagion, and they are frequently found in settings with close contact and inadequate infection control, such as group homes, homeless shelters, residential rehabilitation centers, and correctional facilities. Furthermore, inpatient psychiatry settings are generally designed as communal spaces, with heavy emphasis on group and milieu therapies. As such, inpatient psychiatry services are vulnerable to rampant spread of contagion. OBJECTIVE: With this in mind, the authors outline the decision process and ultimate design and implementation of a regional inpatient psychiatry unit for patients infected with asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 and share key points for consideration in implementing future units elsewhere. CONCLUSION: A major takeaway point of the analysis is the particular expertise of trained experts in psychosomatic medicine for treating patients infected with SARS-CoV-2.


Subject(s)
Asymptomatic Infections , Coronavirus Infections/complications , Hospital Design and Construction/methods , Hospital Units , Hospitalization , Infection Control/methods , Mental Disorders/therapy , Personnel Staffing and Scheduling/organization & administration , Pneumonia, Viral/complications , Betacoronavirus , COVID-19 , Humans , Involuntary Commitment , Mental Disorders/complications , Pandemics , Personal Protective Equipment , Psychiatric Department, Hospital , Psychotherapy, Group/methods , Recreation , SARS-CoV-2 , Ventilation/methods , Visitors to Patients
15.
J Psychiatr Pract ; 27(3): 172-183, 2021 05 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1291616

ABSTRACT

The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic presented unprecedented challenges to the provision of inpatient psychiatric care. The nature of the physical plant, programmatic constraints, and the patient population required a rapid and agile approach to problem-solving under conditions of uncertainty and stress. Flexibility in decision-making, excellent communication, an effective working relationship with infection prevention and control experts, and attention to staff morale and support were important elements of successful provision of care to our inpatients. We present our experience, lessons learned, and recommendations should a resurgence of the pandemic or a similar crisis occur.


Subject(s)
Attitude of Health Personnel , COVID-19 , Inpatients , Mental Disorders/therapy , Personnel, Hospital , Psychiatric Department, Hospital , Adult , COVID-19/prevention & control , Humans , Personnel, Hospital/psychology , Personnel, Hospital/standards , Psychiatric Department, Hospital/organization & administration , Psychiatric Department, Hospital/standards
16.
Qual Health Res ; 31(12): 2340-2350, 2021 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1282216

ABSTRACT

In this article, I use autoethnography to examine time spent on an acute psychiatric ward during the COVID-19 lockdown. I employ the device of "communitas in crisis" to emphasize the precarious nature of this experience and the extent to which, for myself at least, informal social interactions with fellow patients and "communitas" were significant features of my hospital experience and subsequent discharge. I suggest that a lack of emphasis on inpatient to inpatient relationships in the recovery literature is an omission and a reflection of psychiatry's authority struggles with both service users and professionals, along with a general perception of psychosis as individual rather than as a socially constructed phenomenon. I also suggest that, especially in the wake of greater social distancing, mental health and social services should safeguard against psychological and social isolation by creating more spaces for struggling people to interact without fear or prejudice.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Psychotic Disorders , Social Isolation , COVID-19/psychology , Communicable Disease Control , Humans , Psychiatric Department, Hospital
17.
J Psychosoc Nurs Ment Health Serv ; 59(5): 21-24, 2021 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1278545

ABSTRACT

To identify recommendations to improve staff and patient adherence to hand hygiene best practices on inpatient psychiatric units, a survey of the literature was conducted to distill the most effective recommendations. Several interventions have been identified that have met with success in previous outbreaks of infectious disease. These interventions require little more than basic nursing skills: education, time and attention, and knowledge of one's patients. The literature suggests that strict hand hygiene and infection control processes can be implemented to the benefit of an inpatient psychiatric ward, but only with significant adjustments for staff and patients. [Journal of Psychosocial Nursing and Mental Health Services, 59(5), 21-24.].


Subject(s)
Hand Hygiene , Psychiatric Nursing , Guideline Adherence , Humans , Inpatients , Patient Compliance , Psychiatric Department, Hospital
19.
Int Nurs Rev ; 68(2): 196-201, 2021 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1201932

ABSTRACT

AIM: To understand nurses' responses to COVID-19 and identify their uptake of changes in the procedure required for the management of COVID-19 in an inpatient psychiatric ward. BACKGROUND: The infection risk for COVID-19 in an enclosed inpatient psychiatric ward is high due to living arrangements in the ward and the nature of the infectious disease. INTRODUCTION: This paper describes inpatient nurses' experiences, challenges and strategies deployed at the institutional and national levels to contain the spread of infection. METHODS: Written feedback was collected to understand nurses' responses and identify their uptake of changes in procedure following the COVID-19 outbreak in the ward. FINDINGS: Nurses felt shocked, worried, isolated, expressed a lack of confidence, and experienced physical exhaustion. COVID-19 specific challenges were highlighted in the delivery of safe and quality nursing care. Nurses were satisfied with the hospital policy and strategies implemented during the outbreak, acknowledging the importance of support from nursing leaders. DISCUSSION: Practical support and strong nursing leadership have been imperative in the battle against the COVID-19 outbreak in the psychiatric hospital. Psychiatric nursing care was maintained with a modified management and treatment approach. IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING PRACTICE: Nurses' willingness to adjust to the reconfiguration of operations to accommodate changes has been crucial for the healthcare system to run effectively. Good practices and policies established during this crisis should be developed and established permanently in nursing practice. IMPLICATIONS FOR HEALTH POLICY: Prompt and effective contingency planning and policymaking at the national and institutional level, targeting human resource management and infection control, can introduce changes and alternative options for nursing care in a pandemic. CONCLUSION: With support from influential nursing leaders, strategies and policies are imperative in ensuring the successful management of COVID situations in an inpatient psychiatric setting.


Subject(s)
COVID-19/nursing , Infection Control/organization & administration , Nurse's Role , Pneumonia, Viral/nursing , Psychiatric Department, Hospital/organization & administration , Psychiatric Nursing , COVID-19/epidemiology , Humans , Leadership , Pandemics , Pneumonia, Viral/epidemiology , Pneumonia, Viral/virology , SARS-CoV-2 , Singapore/epidemiology
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL